kamagra dubai

Archive for the 'The Gentle Art of Making Enemies' Category

Conservative in the conservative usage

A few weeks ago, on OTM, host Bob Garfield interviewed Tom Teves, father of one of the Auora, movie theater shooting victims, about reporting mass shooting events, in light of yet another mass shooting at a school in Oregon. Following the death of his son, Teves started an initiative called No Notoriety which wants to change how the media covers these events.

This is what the group wants:download

“Limit the name and likeness of the individual in reporting after initial identification, except when the alleged assailant is still at large and in doing so would aid in the assailant’s capture.

Refuse to broadcast/publish self-serving statements, photos, videos and/or manifestos made by the individual. Elevate the names and likenesses of all victims killed and/or injured to send the message their lives are more important than the killer.

Recognize that the prospect of infamy could serve as a motivating factor for other individuals to kill others and could inspire copycat crimes.  Keep this responsibility in mind when reporting.

Agree to promote data and analysis from experts in mental health, public safety, and other relevant professions to support further steps to help eliminate the motivation behind mass murder. Recognize that the individual’s name and likeness is irrelevant to media coverage of such acts unless the alleged assailant is at large.”

It reminds me of the push years ago to change how the media reported on suicide. It’s now well established that certain suicide coverage leads to more suicides, the National Institute of Mental Health even suggests guidelines for how to cover prominent suicides. When famous people commit suicides, the suicide rate increases. Suicide clusters (multiple people in a community committing suicide, after being inspired by the first) are well documented in academic journals.

The suggestions around reporting on a suicide focus on not dramatizing the event or highlighting the response to it (as to not encourage people to martyr themselves) and should include links to suicide prevention tips and mental health resources. The No Notoriety initiative is very similar, minimizing the prominence given to the perpetrators of such acts and promoting resources. Those don’t exactly strike me as huge impositions to ask of the media.

Unfortunately, Garfield’s response was to push back and challenge why the media should alter how it covers topics and claimed that its responsibility is to provide its readers/viewers with the facts of the case, not prevent more shootings. You know, because tradition and stuff.

To which I say, that makes you a terrible goddamn person.

The media doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It influences what goes on in the world, whether that is the goal or not. Journalists certainly don’t seem to complain very much when they break some story about corruption and the authorities launch an investigation or a politician resigns. That means you have to take some responsibility on the other end to.

Journalist filter out lots of extraneous information when crafting pieces. Garfield himself didn’t mention, say, the birthday of Teves, what he (Garfield) had for lunch, what the weather was like. Just because it’s information that could be included doesn’t mean it should be included. The story can stand on its own without giant photos of the perpetrator’s face and frequent references to their poorly written manifesto.

It’s this sort of conservatism (not in the political sense) that society will look back on and say “What the fuck were we thinking?”

Taxation With Representation

Among American citizens who live outside of the US, one frequently discussed topic, generally around April (for the obvious reasons) is the taxation of US citizens who live outside of the US.

If you aren’t aware, and there’s no good reason why you should be, it does not matter where you live, if you have US citizenship, you have to submit a US income tax return every year. Of course, every other country in the world (except Eritrea) requires you to pay taxes based on residence so you have to pay twice. Now, fortunately, the US allows for a certain amount of income for US citizens to be tax exempt, assuming you’re pay taxes in your country of residence.

Unfortunately, you still may be double taxed, even if you aren’t, you have to file two tax returns, and the US imposes a whole host of other requirements on countries and citizens with regards to taxation. This is all done under the guise of trying to prevent US citizens from avoiding income tax by hiding their assets abroad.


Of course literally every other country on the planet (except Eritrea) has figured out some other ways to prevent this. Like, for example, taxing you based on your residence. So if you want to hide your assets abroad, you actually have to reside in the country and pay tax there to do so. (Less you think this will cause rich Americans to move abroad en masse, let me remind you that I pay about 30% more in taxes here than I would in the US. Also, there’s no Chipotle.)

There is a bill being discussed on Congress that addresses some of these issues, namely the bank reporting compliance (banks with US citizens as customers are required to turn over tax details to the IRS.)

It’s a good idea.

A better idea would be to join the ranks of literally every other goddamn country on the planet (except Eritrea) and get rid of the moronic citizenship-based income tax requirement.

2008 - 2014 Neamhsplachas

Website by Molly