Yes, Zwarte Piet Is Racist

“Racism isn’t born, folks, it’s taught. I have a two-year-old son. You know what he hates? Naps! End of list.” -Dennis Leary

It’s that time of year again. Cold weather, pretty lights, snow, presents…and Zwarte Piet.


In the Netherlands, it’s not Santa Claus, it’s Sinterklaas. And he isn’t aided by elves but by Zwarte Piet, which literally translates to “Black Pete.” Fortunately, I was prepared for this holiday by David Sedaris, who wrote an article for Esquire about the tradition (audio of a Sedaris reading here). The origin of Zwarte Piet isn’t clear. According to one story, Sinterklaas defeated a devil and enslaved him as a helper. Other stories suggest that Sinterklaas is from Turkey and his assistant is a Moor, hence the dark features. Another history suggests that the Zwarte Piets were Sinterklaas’ slaves until the early part of the 20th century, when the characters transform to Sinterklaas’ helpers or friends. Or that Sinterklaas liberated Piet from a slave market in Ethiopia and Piet was so grateful he decided to stay on as a servant.

I doubt even members of the Tea Party would have the audacity to claim that a bunch of white people dressed up in black face with curly wigs and big red lips and gold hoop earrings isn’t racist. Yet many Dutch, unfortunately, continue to embrace this tradition. One of oft-heard defenses of Zwarte Piet is that he isn’t actually black, he’s a Moor. This insight into Piet’s history actually reinforces the racism argument. For starters, “Moor” is considered a pejorative term. Nothing like defending racism with racism. Secondly, if Piet is actually from Western North Africa, he would be fairly light-skinned with more Arab features than African features. Another defense argues that the reason Zwarte Piet is black is because climbs down the chimneys to deliver presents and thus gets covered in soot. The Dutch must then have the world’s most interesting chimneys, since those traversing them only get their faces coated in soot, simultaneously reddening just the lips. And making their hair black and curly.

Regardless of the history or obvious negative stereotypes, many will suggest that Sinterklaas and Zwarte Piet are part of an innocent fable for children and it’s the adults who foist racism into the story. But kids are aware of race and they absorb all of those negative stereotypes. In a country with few racial minorities, the first exposure to non-Western Europeans many Dutch kids have is Zwarte Piet. It doesn’t exactly get the discussion of race off on a good foot. It’s hard to move past ingrained cultural norms, even when they are blatantly racist. It’s difficult for people to admit that they participated in something considered by many to be racist. Maybe it’s just my imagination, but I swear I saw fewer kids in blackface this year than I did last year. Let’s hope that trend continues.

Related posts:

  1. Breast Cancer Is Racist
  2. "If" Black Women Were White Women
  3. My Racist Thanksgiving
  • NL-kid

    I’m Dutch and what you describe here is a little over the top. I realize that this topic may be hard to understand for many people outside of the Netherlands but in my country, racism is not connected to Zwarte Piet at all. Note that we are one of the most multi-cultural countries in the world…

    This is the story: Zwarte Piet has nothing to do with black people (perhaps it did several hundred years ago). Kids believe in Sinterklaas as you all believed in Santa. Zwarte Piet is black because he goes down the chimney to deliver kids candy. Kids love Zwarte Pieten! And yes, the reason their faces are black is because they went down the chimney often. You say that that’s weird because their lips are still red but hey why isn’t Santa not covered in soot? Doesn’t he go down the chimney too?

    In any case, this is a tradition that is understandably weird for outsiders. But if you grow up with it

  • Neamhspleachas

    It isn’t weird. Weird is putting mayo on fries. Zwarte Piet is racist. Growing up with something racist might normalize it but it doesn’t make it any less racist.

    Also, noting that Santa isn’t covered in soot isn’t a defense of Zwarte Piet’s exaggerated lips.

  • https://profiles.google.com/dmfarley dmf

    Yes, yes. We’ve heard all of the story-changing apologism before. He’s not black (anymore) it’s just soot. Magical soot, apparently, because it makes his hair into an african stereotype. And his lips. And I’m not sure what your point is about Santa not being sooty as well but I’m pretty sure you just made neamhspleachas point for her. Santa’s not all goofy looking like Piet is… dehhhhh because Santa isn’t a racist, revised, formerly belittling caricature of a black man who is now not black because we don’t want to be considered racist but we want to keep our old traditions that are rooted in racism. He goes down the chimney too. Yes. Exactly. Why isn’t he black whilst Piet is? Precisely because of exactly what 
    neamhspleachas said!

    The problem is, whilst you’re sitting there trying to explain away everything, it’s there. Like a 5 year old with chocolate smeared all over his face, trying to plead to his mother that he can’t be the one who stole the piece of cake. You desperately want people to believe it’s not racist. You appear to probably even believe it yourself. 
    But that doesn’t change the objective evidence that this is some seriously racist shit. 

    Racism doesn’t have to be overt or even intentional, to be racism. 

    (Also, the Netherlands is over 80% Dutch. How is that even close to “one of the most multi-cultural countries in the world”? Tolerant, maybe. Multicultural? Compared to China? Sure. Compared to anything in the Americas? Not hardly.)



Need More?Like What You See Here?Copyright
E-Mail
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Google Plus
Powered By Wordpress
Need More By Social Media Widget
Social Media Icons Are Magic Marker
Twitter Feed By Xhanch
TwitPics By My Pictures Widget
Share Bar By Sexy Bookmarks
© 2008 - 2012 Neamhspleachas.Com
All Rights Reserved